Ask me (almost) anything.  

Conni's Blog


Me writing about things I think about.
Former Brighton Art Student in London, originally from Essex.

Death / The Atomic Bomb / Pop Culture / WORK

"Death exists, not as the opposite but as a part of life.

It’s a cliche translated into words, but at the time I felt it not as words but as that knot of air inside me. Death exists - in a paperweight, in four red and white balls on a pool table - and we go on living and breathing it in to our lungs like fine dust.”

Murakami, Norwegian Wood.

After The Flash: Photography From The Atomic Archive, the latest exhibition to open at WORK gallery (where I work, coincidently) is a showcase of the camera’s relation to nuclear technologies; both recording the actions taking place and the effects it has on societies at large. Curated by John O’Brian (atomic archivist who contributed the exhibited works and edited the accompanying book) and my manager Marianne Templeton, the show is divided into three sections; the first being the imagery of the mushroom clouds over Japan as the bombs were dropped, followed by action shots of workers in the field, and ending with images suggesting the ways that the effects of nuclear technologies and anxiety have had on American culture. The private view was a really interesting experience, as a lot of the attendees (most of them Photography students at RCA) were American themselves, and spoke of the uneasy relationship they had with the images. A lot of them spoke of how they loved the images in the way that they see them as artistic and aesthetic objects, which then conflicted with the fact that the images come from a source of abhorrent terror, which is largely unspoken about in American education.

What particularly struck me, along with many others, was how elements of the war became so ingrained within popular culture, for example, the vocabulary used—”Atomic” becoming a popular term in advertising and leisure, as the picture below demonstrates. 

I think the exhibition is very successful in demonstrating this, as the curatorial execution of the show places the images of explicit wounds and death, in a diagonal direction towards the subversive images of the everyday, which is echoed in the display’s serene quietness. The result being an uncomfortable nostalgia where horror and popular culture become entwined. 

image

Mushroom cloud over Nagasaki.

image

Estimated parameters of destruction in Manhattan, released for public consumption.

image

Anti-Nuclear War protest sign, 1969.

image

Atomic Lanes bowling alley, 1960s America.

— 1 week ago with 2 notes
#Nuclear  #WORK  #photography  #Pop culture 
UP Projects / Floating Cinema / Fun Palaces / INPUT

For the past six months I have been interning at a public arts organisation called UP Projects, where I have mostly been co-ordinating all of the volunteers for their main project, the Floating Cinema—a barge with a cinema built on board that travels across London putting on events such as screening, talks, tours and workshops. After an amazing summer being part of the integral programme, myself and a few of the volunteers were given the opportunity to use the boat to host a free event in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park as part of the Fun Palaces initiative. 

The Fun Palaces scheme was originally devised by iconic theatre director Joan Littlewood who is said to have pioneered the left-wing Theatre Workshop, as well as devising lots of plans for social mobility in the arts and other cool stuff. The idea behind Fun Palaces was that community groups would create free events (or a “Fun Palace”) for their community, with the ethos that everyone is an artist, everyone is a scientist. 

Littlewood died in 2002 and never got to see the scheme take place, but as October 2014 marked the centenary of her birth, a national initiative was launched, with Fun Palaces taking place across the whole country on the weekend of the 4th/5th October.

Our small team consisted of 5 of us altogether, meeting regularly over the course of a month. After deciding to go with a theme surrounding the human body and its connection to nature, we formed a collaboration with science & arts collective Super/Collider, who proposed the event title “Input”, and are a really cool bunch of people and really great to work with. They facilitated two workshops:

Dario Villanueva ran a voice recognition workshop using an app on his phone which transformed the voice into an image and projected it on to the boat’s cinema screen.

Sam Battle then ran his workshop “Tactile Theremin”, which used a theremin to transform the body into a musical instrument from its electrical pulses.

Parallel to this, my amazing friend Rachel McGivern ran a drop-in workshop outside the boat on the pontoon, with her very own drawing machine, which was so so awesome, and really showed off how imaginative she is as an illustrator and facilitator. She also designed all of the marketing material for the event. Amazing!

Despite there being some really gross weather during the day, we still had a steady flux of visitors (including some of my lovely friends who came to drop by) and people seemed to really enjoy themselves and engage with the workshops. The atmosphere on the boat amongst the team members was also really inspiring as everyone was so positive and supportive of each other. 

Finally, to round the day off, we ran a screening of feature-length documentary Nostalgia for the Light, which is a beautiful, moving and harrowing film about the relatives of victims to Pinochet’s regime in Chile, as they search for their remains lost in the Atacama desert—alongside the leading experts in astronomy attempting to decipher the beginning of life in the stars. I felt that the film choice tied the curatorial themes of the event together in a really sophisticated way, and a lot of the visitors who had come to see the film commented about how interesting it was, particularly as Pinochet’s regime is not commonly known about over here. I’m really glad we decided to screen it—even if it was maybe a little macabre for the “Fun Palaces” theme…!

I feel really sad to have to be leaving UP Projects as it is such a great organisation, the work involved is super interesting and so fun, and I have met so many awesome people. I feel so grateful to have had such a great opportunity, so really, I can’t complain. :) 

 Further reading/viewing:

The volunteers’ blog named Input

Our event on the Guardian Witness' Fun Palace feature

— 1 week ago
#fun palaces  #floatingcinema  #super/collider  #Joan Littlewood  #qeop  #canal  #community  #fun 
Books / Photographs / Google / Imaginary Travels

Lately I have been thinking about a habit I have with books; every time I begin something new set in a time and place other than my own I have to do a Google search so that I can imagine the descriptions more clearly and create a true image of these places in my head. For example, I am currently reading “Norwegian Wood” by Haruki Murakami, which is set in Tokyo, 1969 (or the beginning is at least) and a large presence in the story and at that exact year is the rise of university student protests, so naturally I am undertaking some minor “research” into that. It’s funny looking at these images that crop up across the internet that seem so random and unimportant on the spew of a Google search, but become the backdrop, costume and even faces to a story I’m trying to imagine, and visualise. It’s weird when you visit these places as well and you try and re-piece fragments of a story in a physical landscape that were flat and continuous in your head, and then become broken and hazy as you walk those same steps the book in question describes, trying to remember it all in the real world.
Basically I now really want to go to Tokyo!
Student protests, 1969.Police targeting student protests in Tokyo, 1969.
Train station platform in 1960s Tokyo.1960s Tokyo.

— 1 week ago
#Books  #Murakami  #Tokyo  #Travels  #Google 
The Great Photo Leak of 2014 Has Rebooted My Need For Feminism

This summer has seen a startling rise in the leakage of celebrity nude photographs, seemingly taken by calculating hackers with agenda to tap into the Clouds of the rich and famous females of Hollywood. This trend is not new, in fact, the stereotype of the celebrity gaining fame through the “rumoured leak” of a home-made sex tape has been passed off as “just one of those things” as long as I can remember, from Paris Hilton to Kim Kardashian, these kind of happenings have always seemed to be part of the Beverly Hills claim for fame background. But this new phase of leakage has made many, including myself, think very differently.

Perhaps it is the context that is so striking; this is not just one celebrity who has been hacked, but many in one go; this is not a hoard of unknown rich girls with semi-famous parents (not that that makes it ok by any stretch of the imagination), but well established actors, singers and public figures, who would be in no need of this kind of publicity. The act of stealing, and spying with such malicious intent for humiliation, is so blunt that it becomes almost chilling. It seemed so easy to shrug shoulders of the matter before, and pass it off as one of those things that just happens, but this recent of female body shaming has proved that we must think of this subject differently, particularly in light of the threats made towards Emma Watson after her speech on Feminism at the UN. 

What we need to recognise is that this kind of privacy breaching is not just one of those things, it is a large scale symptom of our culture’s persistent betrayal of the female body and of female sexuality. I have always found my Feminism in the questions it causes me to ask, and in this case it is one that repeats itself time and time again: Who is this for?  

What I mean is, how is it so that the portrayal of many women in Hollywood is one that appears hyper-sexual in their public appearance, and can yet coalesce so readily with the stolen portraits of women in their own private, normal, sexual lives that are distributed as shameful and laughable? I have found that there is one answer to this question; it—that being, your sexuality—is not for you. As long as the media purports that a woman’s body is to be looked at, wanked over and/or laughed at, a woman’s sexuality is not recognised as being her own, and I think we need to recognise that in the greater scheme of things, this notion affects us (the non-famous) as much as it does anyone living in the public eye. We need to end the idea that this kind of thing is ok and that it just happens, and we need to begin from ourselves; much like the way that if you witness bullying you become a bully yourself, if you knowingly click on images of leaked nude photos, you perpetuate the myth that a woman’s body is shameful and laughable. We need to say No to these images being offered to us. We need to say No to the idea that this is just the way it is.

— 3 weeks ago with 2 notes
#feminism  #photo leak  #media  #emma watson  #sex tape  #questions  #popular culture  #sexualisation  #taking a long time to realise something is obviously not ok  #hacker  #4chan 
Art School & Hereafter

0.  Art Foundation, the beginning of it all, the launch. A place we stumbled into, arrogantly imagining our brightest futures and secretly competing, daydreaming. We were told to make choices, choose a direction, think more, read more, see more, do more, be more. A rite of passage away from the school of arithmetic and fact seemed to have opened, and we surged forward blindly, for if not we would just end the dream completely.

1.  How strange it seems to think of this fresh, first year of university again, when everything was so new and exciting and terrifying. When everyone had eyes the size of saucers trying to take everything in. The precision of dress and speech driven by anxiety, unbearable, and perhaps so laughable now. Cut open by tutors and educators, we were forced to rotate those saucer-sized eyes onto ourselves, onto the world, and back again

2.  The second year; the in-between-year where the dust attempted to settle as we seemed already so far from the beginning—the ending at this point ominous and yet unimaginable, really. We all began to latch on to things; words, images and objects, traces and hints that we compiled, organised, and archived, whilst attempting to mumble the words “this is me, this is my art”.

3.  And so it arrived; The Third, Final, Finale, Year. A trajectory in itself. Suddenly everything sped up, and as we ran we selected and gathered larger fragments from the world we gazed at so openly until now, molding it into the image of our new selves, our seemingly ultimate selves that took three years to sow. We crafted elegantly with our matured and perfected tools of discipline for the show—the final show—and like the dandelion we bloomed and all the seeds burst and blew in every direction. 

4.  And so here we are; another year has almost passed and I can’t help but notice how differently time seems to move now—so much slower and yet I seem to have missed it passing me by. Suddenly we find ourselves in this state of slow, perpetual flux; moving to the city, balancing homes, jobs, internships—making jokes about painting the boards of coffee shops and craft-brewery pubs, whilst waiting to ask each other the question “have you made anything lately…?” 

5.

— 5 months ago
#art school  #text  #art writing  #exhibition text  #time 
Short Story.

The girl kept her back turned to her phone for as long as possible. 

She was lying in bed and the phone was lying next to her pillow. How long could she spend pretending to still be asleep before having to roll over and face the fact that he had tried to call her?

In her mind, she tried to trace back all of the images that had appeared in her dream. She could have sworn that his name on her iphone screen was one of them. Had she tried calling him in her sleep!? Which would mean that his missed call was him trying to call her back…”That would be so embarrassing if it did happen”, she thought. “Imagine trying to explain that one”. 

She could just see it; him and his new girlfriend laughing about it over rum and cokes and cigarettes with their crowd. She had wanted to be friends with him again in a distant sort of way. She had recently been considering sending him a message wishing him well and telling him that she was happy for him, happy that he’d found someone else who wanted what he wanted, and who seemed…just, nice. Not like that other girl he started seeing.

But now that it was all real and that she had seen his new girlfriend in the flesh, she felt like the angry bitchy ex again. She felt small and scrutinized, like a child on the edge of the playing field. She felt he somehow had the power. “How the tables have turned”, she thought. 

Her eyes snapped open and she realized that she just couldn’t lie down anymore. She had work to do, and she was hungry, and anyway, she considered herself far better than this situation. She didn’t care, but even so, decided to leave her phone on the pillow whilst she went downstairs.

Her mother was in the kitchen making nut loaf for the family party later that day. The girl hoped he hadn’t told his new girlfriend too much abut her family- their strange ways…”That would be just like him”, she thought. “Immature, acting like the big lad with his mates, pint in hand”. She could see it now…little him with all his bad “Lad” mates who all shout things like “WHEEEEEY” and “MATE” and, of course, “LAD LAD LAD”. Little him standing on the edge of this “Lad” group and trying to shout his way in…Occasionally one of them may respond…

”Though I think he’s made friends with a new group of “Lads” now”, she mused. “Maybe they’l listen to him more than the old lot”. She thought about seeing them all in the pub…All of them talking about her…the girl tried to put this image out of her mind as it made her feel under threat, like she was preparing for war.

She sat in front of the television having made herself a bowl of cereal and after getting confused with the new remote control, decided to put on an x-factor spin off show. The girl wondered for a minute if perhaps she was wasting her life away, but decided against it because her friends always watch these shows and they’re fine.

“What would he want, I mean, what would he really want?” She thought. Did He Just Want To Brag? She imagined his voice on the end of the phone, pretending to be all friendly but she would be able to see straight through it…”Heeeey! ‘Ow’s it goiiiing?”. Eurgh.

She had always hated his drunk voice, trying to be “laddy” and “cool” in an exaggerated accent that wasn’t really his. She imagined telling him to Shut Up, as it was always so relishing to do, and hearing him stress out and become whiny and child-like, like an angry little boy. There was something she loved about arguing with him, his absolute inability to articulate himself. She loved that whenever they argued he would trip up on his words and would become angrier and angrier with his voice getting laddier and just ridiculous really—sometimes “laddish” hand gestures would be thrown in. She would be able to catch him out with every argument. If she felt like it she would become dramatic and shrill and throw her arms around. If not, she would stand there with arms crossed staring blankly, a trick she had learned from her old boyfriend before him. Either way, it was like being a cat with a ball of string; she had the power, and she could play it whatever way she wanted.

Having finished her cereal, the girl put her bowl down on the floor next to the sofa, and went back into the kitchen to make a cup of tea.

What Would I say About Me? she thought. If He’s Bragging About Her, What Do I Say About Me? 

— 6 months ago
#girl  #short story  #ex boyfriend 
On “The Edward Curtis Project: A Modern Picture Story”

As part of the exhibition “Ecocentrix: Indigenous Arts, Sustainable Acts” at Bargehouse, Oxo Tower Wharfe.

image

The clean, crisp space hosting the body of work by Rita Leistner seems almost out of place having walked up the brick warehouse-like steps of the Bargehouse stairwell. Upon entry to the room, we are confronted with a collection of small frames hanging on all four walls, each one holding a pair of photographs. Taken as a collaboration with playwright Marie Clements, the work is a photo-documentary collection addressing the representation of the Native Americans throughout history, with (titled) reference to nineteenth century photographer Edward Curtis. Curtisʼ colonial-era photographs aimed to document what he called a “vanishing race”—it is this notion that Leistner and Clements aim to challenge.

As the gaze drifts from frame to frame, we are introduced to Native American individuals across all ages—from teenagers in fashionable sports clothes to the elderly in rain coats— scattered across the wall as we are lead through Curtisʼ original trail. The duality of images shows the individual in their usual, contemporary clothes, and then again in traditional Native American dress. Their gaze is always directly at the camera—the viewer forced to look them in the eye.

Underneath the images are short, almost unnoticeable descriptions of their daily lives and genealogy. One man depicted in both his American army uniform and traditional Native American dress, has a brief caption underneath which states that his family were forced to walk the Trail of Tears as part of the Indian Removal Act of 1830—an uncut but still subtle hint at the horror that the Native American race has been subjected to, still lingering in social history. But this man is clearly happy, as he smiles knowingly to the camera, his large, uniformed body exuding his power as a twenty-first century man—a man who defiantly owns his own history.

As we continue looking through the stories of these pictures, crouching down and straining necks upwards to read all the fragments of everyday lives, we encounter a hoard of emotions; the tears of the lonely, the tender embraces between friends, and the unmoving stares of those who seem to be in on something that we are not. Perhaps this something is the legacy that we have somehow been so unaware of? For as these bright, colourful images show, these First Nation people are still very much embedded within our landscape. It is interesting to see the traditional dress claimed back in such an empowered manner, when it has evidently become so disseminated within popular culture. How did we forget the people it belonged to?

There is something beautiful about this work and yet haunting—I find myself thinking back to it as we continue through the exhibition of artifacts, films, discussion and interaction. The piece makes itself a profound statement on the misinterpreted, exploited and plainly ignored history of the Native American, through its quiet confidence. The tremor comes from what it doesnʼt say, making it the perfect contribution to a show that is, out of necessity, trying to say so much.

— 11 months ago with 1 note
#native american  #rita leistner  #oxo tower wharf  #ecocentrix  #Activist Art 
If Heaven Exists What Does it Look Like?

To me, Heaven, if it was to exist, would look like a long stretch of road surrounded by vast skies with the desert glistening in the golden sun. We are in a car and driving really, really fast. Hair blowing. Think the video for “My Favourite Game” by The Cardigans, or the closing scene from Cruel Intentions. Reese Witherspoon riding off into the distance; her girlish, blonde, blue-eyed face defiant as she grips the wheel of her man’s big black car.

In the car we (I say “we” because in Heaven I am never lonely) listen to our favourite albums. These are actually my favourite albums but, because it is Heaven, we all love them. “What’s The Story Morning Glory?” by Oasis, “Dark Side of the Moon” by Pink Floyd, Kirsty Mccoll’s Greatest Hits “Galore” album, “Automatic for the People” by REM, The Stone Roses’ self-titled debut album. The list continues.

The rippling swathes of guitar pulse through our hearts like a first breath, over and over again. The wind pulls back the skin of our faces as we race into adrenalin. As we drive we are leaning to stare down the sides of green-blue mountains, gazing at the tops of clouds. We turn each corner to the swerve of each vocal.

We film each other through grainy screens on our phones so that we’l never forget this moment, but no piece of footage could ever capture our experience of this day. This is freedom.

We are alive.  

— 1 year ago with 1 note
Is Liberace’s Bio-pic a New Horizon in Cinema or am I Just Laughing at Gays?

image

"Behind the Candelabra" is an interesting one. It has managed to open up one big crate of cans filled to the brim with worms concerning gay screen politics; having been shunned by Hollywood producers and being sent straight to the HBO television channel in America, only to be followed by hails of praise for the "bravery" of Michael Douglas and Matt Damon for playing a gay couple.

I am, in no way, disputing that it was brave of the duo to play those roles. It is brave, it is. But with the actors actually congratulating themselves on their bravery, one wonders where the compassion for the communities they represent by playing these roles actually lies…

This question could also be asked about the portrayals within the film itself; the screen is dazzling with colour and jewels- as Liberace’s life famously was so. The overt campiness and ridiculousness of this scenery and of the behaviour within it creates an array of LOL moments (for example when Douglas as Liberace cuddles and coos over his pet pooch named Baby Boy)- but I couldn’t help but wonder if it was funny, or at least made funnier by the fact that the audience knows that’s it Action Hero Michael Douglas acting gay. Are we just laughing at two classically heterosexual men parodying, what Society sees as, Gay culture? In other words, does this film just kind of point and laugh at Gays?

Maybe I’m overreacting, but then let’s ask another question…Where are the gay actors? Not even just the leading ones; where are the supporting gay actors!? A film about a secret figure of Gay Social and Cultural History…and there are no gay actors!

But then again, if gay actor had been used as the leads in this film, would it have seen as much mainstream success outside of the Gay Community?

Probably not, no. Here’s to Equality.

— 1 year ago
THIS ONE’S FOR THE GIRLS (INDEPENDENT WOMEN)

When life is pulling you down, what is it that makes you feel stronger? As you grew up, how did you learn to be independent? Do you ever feel empowered? When you come face to face with The Man, at what point do you ask him who really runs the world? 

Is this a musing on contemporary women’s issues, or the makings of a hit single? 

There is barely a day that goes by where I don’t end up getting into some kind of debate about a female pop singer’s policy on women’s issues; whether its Destiny’s Child telling us to surround ourselves with positive things, or Ciara claiming that its time to switch (gender) roles. So many female pop/hip-hop performers use lyrics entwined with female rhetoric, hailing the power of women. These become the anthems we howl out with our girlfriends on a Friday night, or blare out in the car to instantly lift a bad mood. What is interesting is how many female performers claim to be singing these songs for “all you women out there”, and yet none of them ever mention the word “Feminism”- but should they? 

Feminism and the Women’s Liberation Movement has been under attack since the day it began, its main perpetrators being the media. A wall of Fear has been built around this movement; to be Feminist is to be angry, frumpy, un-feminine, un-shaven, single, or a dyke. I have learnt this through experience- not through what I have witnessed, but through the questions that people have asked me in my research. I still find myself mumbling when I talk abut my work, because its scary to be identified with something so evocative. When there are stigmas like this attached to a movement, if its not something you truly know about, its easier to avoid associating with it than attempting to deal with it, even if, unwittingly, you share the same ideals. Identifying as a “Feminist” is like a coming-out process, suddenly you seem to be placed in this new identity, because people don’t know how to deal with you. This is not something I was comfortable with, because whilst I am completely for Feminism than not for it, I am still grappling with ideas of what it even means to be Feminist. Just like the masses of pop singers out there, I’m still not entirely sure what Feminism is.

Feminist History is something that is primarily left completely out of school education, bar maybe the Suffragettes. But how are girls, teenagers, women- and men- in the 21st Century able to identify with black and white photographs taken nearly a hundred years before-hand? The fact that women only gained freedom within the last century is something we completely take for granted, and things are so much better for the female population now, of course they are (at least in this country anyway). However, that does not mean that young women and girls today should be shielded from their own gender’s history, especially when it was so recent and it has the potential to unleash so much power.

But is it the ideals of Feminism that have been seemingly banished to the past, or is it the word itself? The term Feminism (noun- a movement or theory that supports the rights of women, as prescribed by the Oxford English Dictionary) is one that has gradually filtered out of prolific use since its peaking era between 1968 and the 1980s. Movements and discussions have continued since then, but it was in the nineties that these discourses were shunned from prime viewing and were surpassed by the new female revolution; Girl Power. I was born in 1991; Feminism was not something that held an immediate effect on my childhood. In fact up until I was about seventeen I thought nothing more of Feminism than the episode of the Simpsons in which Marge burns her bra. What I, and many others around me have seen as empowering, are these terms that come out through popular culture; Survivor! Independent Women! Ladies! Girls! The lyrics of Pop and Hip-Hop songs are sometimes the only thing that will get you pumped up to face a difficult situation. It could be argued that such a vast amount of pressure is placed upon female singers today to be these strong independent women role models, because young girls have little or no other way of learning about what it is to be empowered as a woman. As we have grown up the only way we know how to talk about the issues of women is within the framework of the terms listed above. To be Feminist is something different; it is seen as somehow stepping into new territory.

The reason we look back on history so avidly is to attempt to decipher where we are in time and how we got here, thus partly defining who it is that we are and how we continue on to be our ideal selves. Whilst we may not be banging at the doors of democracy, or facing the same struggles anymore, surely we should be attempting to internalize all of these positive elements that exist within our own history, instead of trying to grasp the scattered clues disseminated across popular culture? 

These female stars are such unstable figures for inspiration when it comes to the power of women; you can debate all you like about the fem-linguistic qualities of Beyonce’s anthems, but when it comes to it, did she actually set out to change the world for women? No, she set out to be a singing/dancing Hip-hop sensation and make a lot of money. When it comes to women understanding what an empowering women is, surely we should be recognizing and internalizing our own history of strength- events in time that were created by women for women. Take away the stigma, take away the stereotype, and recognize where we come from. If we do this, who knows how strong our future could be. 

— 1 year ago with 3 notes